Media Research Project

“The primary objective of the ADC-RI Media Research Project is to research, track, and document anti-Arab and Islamophobic bias in the media, public discourse, and from public officials. This tracking project will serve as a resource tool which will highlight the prevalence of bias and bigotry. The project will expose xenophobia and hatred that target minorities in the U.S., particularly Arab and Muslim Americans.
The project will also celebrate achievements of Arabs and Muslims from around the world.”

Search
Generic filters

   Try these: RacismIslamophobiaAnti ArabAnti Islam

Rachel Maddow’s Blind Spot: Outspoken on Russia, Silent on Israel

by ADC Team

MS NOW’s (formerly MSNBC) top-rated media personality, Rachel Maddow, has devoted countless hours to dissecting Donald Trump’s alleged ties to Russia and its leader, Vladimir Putin, since the president was first elected back in 2016. 

During the height of the so-called Russiagate scandal, when former FBI Director Robert Mueller was investigating Trump’s 2016 campaign ties with Russia, Maddow became the Shahrazad of Russiagate, hosting 1001 Nights of inquiries into every possible connection between Trump and Putin on her cable news show. 

Despite looking underneath every stone, Maddow has produced very little substance to back up her claims that Putin owns Trump, something she recently admitted on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert: “I don’t know what Putin has on him, but he works for Putin, and it’s an embarrassment to this country.” 

It’s amusing that Maddow has devoted so much attention to Trump and Putin’s relationship and so little to Trump’s relationship with Israeli leader Netanyahu. For starters, Trump has done more for Netanyahu than Putin. 

In his first term, for instance, Trump signed sanctions into law against Russia while he delivered several gifts to Israel from moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, recognizing the Israeli annexation of the Golan Heights, closing down the PLO’s mission in Washington, cutting aid to the UN agency responsible for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA), and putting forth a so-called peace plan that would have permitted Israel to annex 30% of the occupied West Bank. 

While Trump has been less theatiracally subservient toward Netanyahu in his second term, he has still done many things to make the Israeli leader happy from placing sanctions on the International Criminal Court, which has indicted the Israeli premier for war crimes, to clamping down on pro-Palestinian activism on campuses, including through deportation of foreign students, joining Israel’s bombing of Iran’s nuclear sites, and continuing the flow of arm sales to Israel and even turning a blind eye to Israel’s repeated violations of an ostensible ceasefire that Trump negotiated. And, just today, Trump acceded to not only Netanyahu’s Gaza demands, but also tentatively agreed to join in another attack on Iran. 

It’s worth pointing out that in the lead-up to Trump and Netanyahu’s big meeting, the New York Times reported

Israel’s continued strikes in Gaza since the cease-fire appear to have angered the Trump administration, which wants to extend and build on the truce, not jeopardize it.

Similarly, Israel’s military actions in Lebanon and Syria appear at odds with the Trump administration’s efforts to stabilize governments in both countries.

Mr. Trump has repeatedly shown impatience with Mr. Netanyahu. And he could use their meeting on Monday to squeeze the Israeli leader on some or all of these fronts.

Mr. Netanyahu is expected to urge Mr. Trump to back him in continuing to apply pressure to Iran, which Israeli officials say is rebuilding its missile arsenal.

In the end, Netanyahu typically got what he wanted — and Trump has nothing to show for it. Trump is notoriously transactional with foreign leaders, but has consistently let Netanyahu get the better deal.

Putin, on the other hand, has faced Trump’s continued support for Ukraine, even if begrudgingly, and Trump’s efforts to pressure Russia to end the war by strongarming Europe and other nations to cease buying Russian energy — going so far as to slap heavy tariffs on India for its purchases of Russian oil

If Putin, rather than Netanyahu, supposedly “has something on” Trump—and if Trump is truly “working for Putin”—then Putin must be remarkably bad at controlling his subordinates. 

If Maddow were consistent in analyzing foreign influence in U.S. politics, she should turn a long-overdue head toward Israel’s broad influence operation in the United States. She could start with one of Trump’s biggest political donors, the Israeli-American Miriam Adelson, who, alongside her now-deceased husband, was Trump’s largest campaign donor for both his 2016 and 2020 presidential campaigns

Miriam donated over $100 million to Trump’s successful 2024 campaign. And here’s a Russiagate connection: Miriam and her late husband were also donors to a legal fund for Trump Administration aides caught up in the Mueller investigation

Adelson is a radical Zionist who opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state and supports Israeli settlements, including financing settlements and even a settler militia, and has stated that her heart is in Israel, but she was “stuck” in America due to her marriage to the Las Vegas casino tycoon Sheldon Adelson. She has bragged about how Trump has delivered for Israel, and an organization she funds may have played a role in the Trump administration’s clampdown on pro-Palestinian campus activism. It is hard to believe that, as an Israeli citizen, Adelson is not playing the role of influencing Trump in the direction of a foreign country, using her campaign donations as one of the world’s richest people to do so. 

If Maddow wants to explore who has something on Trump, Miriam Adelson would be a more grounded place to start. 

You may also like